Return-Path: <faisal@banglamark.com.bd>
Delivered-To: sara@banglamarkgroup.com
Received: from server2.www.flokoin.com
	by server2.www.flokoin.com with LMTP
	id n4uSCmaybWkkBgMAB2Lfrw
	(envelope-from <faisal@banglamark.com.bd>)
	for <sara@banglamarkgroup.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:26:14 +0000
Return-path: <faisal@banglamark.com.bd>
Envelope-to: sara@banglamarkgroup.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:26:14 +0000
Received: from sender4-op-o12.zoho.com ([136.143.188.12]:17239)
	by server2.www.flokoin.com with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.99.1)
	(envelope-from <faisal@banglamark.com.bd>)
	id 1vhgqD-00000000pWi-0JW9
	for sara@banglamarkgroup.com;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:26:13 +0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1768796729; cv=none; 
	d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; 
	b=c297rBHWFgLoC8prLuBfULndMUIJht1K8zCdrZJbsUI4Jgln20hteSmpHdXeM3gQSSzr872bWNSd20gKuSCqjx/y93X3Uw6kbLt1ZS86o2ztg2BAzyVLR4v1AiT9aWuUsmn2ZKq2Z899eZT6PjB+HxZHN+F93udU1G3FSrYQeS8=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; 
	t=1768796729; h=Content-Type:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:From:From:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Reply-To; 
	bh=FyXqz7x45c++tNXm4mBu0AqrQ/xNU5YiUq9D/ShmiPI=; 
	b=ONKPmivFNvyaNcsLA/lFal7HxC2gMyGWX7BfM/B9iUOo8HCzCIUYfl5UPFKot2p1Nq/cvsXuDHapnCGEhAuNk77bv8aoIPj0J03y0OpMscv7oGnJIrpIhh6BDIK9rtjHk4OYxgSnSIdQS1WXmeEIt/x1xqJvL6sY/PX8mC4yOTc=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com;
	dkim=pass  header.i=banglamark.com.bd;
	spf=pass  smtp.mailfrom=faisal@banglamark.com.bd;
	dmarc=pass header.from=<faisal@banglamark.com.bd>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1768796729;
	s=zmail; d=banglamark.com.bd; i=faisal@banglamark.com.bd;
	h=Date:Date:From:From:To:To:Cc:Cc:Message-Id:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:Subject:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Reply-To;
	bh=FyXqz7x45c++tNXm4mBu0AqrQ/xNU5YiUq9D/ShmiPI=;
	b=RT8IrtWrb8I9fKpGhI8/5lqQY3dDR1R5hpSzd39pfHGVa8DuxtAioii6L3KaNUQI
	fdYEGq3Cyaxi+aHaeslb1SopVb/xI+ymmnyOHxDOeq6ltyPT3AGN1vhWH99WfTvGYZs
	AUeNnR7zDD9qiOtSBGIeYRCXQbrx5lyHuv2XdLuE=
Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com
	with SMTP id 1768796727694117.64888429114717; Sun, 18 Jan 2026 20:25:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:25:27 +0600
From: Faisal - BANGLAMARK <faisal@banglamark.com.bd>
To: "'Iftekhar'" <iftekhar@banglamark.com.bd>
Cc: "Steven" <steven@banglamark.com>, "Bickey" <bickey@banglamark.com.bd>,
	"'Rocky -BANGLAMARK'" <rocky@banglamark.com.bd>,
	"sara" <sara@banglamarkgroup.com>
Message-Id: <19bd480294e.1f4141b22218698.6036488516950955390@banglamark.com.bd>
In-Reply-To: 
Subject: Regarding Unauthorized Absence and Required Action
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_7647513_1993910437.1768796727630"
Importance: Medium
User-Agent: Zoho Mail
X-Mailer: Zoho Mail
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4
X-Spam-Score: 24
X-Spam-Bar: ++
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server2.www.flokoin.com",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Dear Sir, Please note that Khaled Bhai from the Creative Team
    has not been coming to the office since 25th December 2025. Additionally,
    he has informed me that he would leave on 15th Jan 2026 as he got a new jo
    [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.4 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                              Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                            [136.143.188.12 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                         [136.143.188.12 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                              Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                             [136.143.188.12 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [136.143.188.12 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URI: banglamark.com.bd]
 -1.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5      RBL: Excellent reputation (+5)
                             [136.143.188.12 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.0 ARC_SIGNED             Message has a ARC signature
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
                             domain
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 -0.1 ARC_VALID              Message has a valid ARC signature
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders
  1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING         BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
  2.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS      Similar addresses in recipient list
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
X-Spam-Flag: NO

------=_Part_7647513_1993910437.1768796727630
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear Sir,

Please note that Khaled Bhai from the Creative Team has not been coming to the office since 25th December 2025. Additionally, he has informed me that he would leave on 15th Jan 2026 as he got a new job opportunity. But instead of handover, he has only referred to you and Rocky Bhai without any formal clarification whether he will leave or remain.

At this point, there should be a clear conclusion on whether he will continue with this company or not. If there is no confirmation, his absence should be treated as unauthorized leave as per company policy. In such a case, the Admin department should formally close the matter, and we may proceed with new recruitment accordingly.

I request your kind involvement to help conclude this issue in line with company policy.

Thank you.


Best regards,

Fasal Bin Nizam
------=_Part_7647513_1993910437.1768796727630
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head>=
<meta content=3D"text/html;charset=3DUTF-8" http-equiv=3D"Content-Type"></h=
ead><body ><div style=3D"font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif=
; font-size: 10pt;"><p class=3D"isSelectedEnd"><span>Dear Sir,</span><br></=
p><p class=3D"isSelectedEnd"><span>Please note that </span><b><span>Khaled =
Bhai from the Creative Team has not been coming to the office since 25th De=
cember 2025</span></b><span>. Additionally, he has informed me that he woul=
d leave on 15th Jan 2026 as he got a new job opportunity. But instead of ha=
ndover, he has only referred to you and Rocky Bhai without any formal clari=
fication whether he will leave or remain.</span><br></p><p class=3D"isSelec=
tedEnd"><span>At this point, there should be a clear conclusion on whether =
he will continue with this company or not. If there is no confirmation, his=
 absence should be treated as </span><b><span>unauthorized leave</span></b>=
<span> as per company policy. In such a case, the Admin department should f=
ormally close the matter, and we may proceed with </span><b><span>new recru=
itment</span></b><span> accordingly.</span><br></p><p class=3D"isSelectedEn=
d"><span>I request your kind involvement to help conclude this issue in lin=
e with company policy.</span><br></p><p class=3D"isSelectedEnd"><span>Thank=
 you.</span><br></p><p></p><div><span>Best regards,</span><br></div><div><b=
><span>Fasal Bin Nizam</span></b><br></div><p></p><div><br></div></div><br>=
</body></html>
------=_Part_7647513_1993910437.1768796727630--

